Well, whether you've heard or said them, at one point or another, you have experienced them.
As a student, you have probably at one point or another decided to watch the movie, or thought the movie would give you the same information as the book. Maybe you still think that now. It doesn't matter how old you are, what you're studying in school, or even if your whole life is dedicated to reading. I am a 21-year-old English Education Major who reads every day, and I STILL sometimes have an urge to just watch the movie.
It is very difficult for some English majors to admit that at one point or another they wanted to watch the movie. Whether or not they acted on it is on their own consciences (I keep telling mine to leave me alone). In any case, it is generally known to society that the movies, while most of the time displaying decent adaptations, leave out some crucial moments in the book.
Now that is exactly what people get angry about when they see a movie based on a book, right? They say, "I can't believe they left this part out! It was so important!" While I myself get a little annoyed at these things, I keep reminding myself that there is a time limit in film and television that does not exist in books. At most, moviemakers have 3 hours to make the movie attempt to measure up to the glorified entity that is the book. When reading the book, you have all the time in the world to finish it, and even re-read some parts if you wanted. To go even further, why not read the whole thing again (I mean, there's no way I read The Other Boleyn Girl 7 times, what are you talking about?)?
While I am defending the movie industry, I am also attempting to make a point that movies are not the only thing to be relied on, especially when studying a piece of literature in school. The movies will be enjoyable, I'm sure, but books hold the key to the themes and symbolism that must be absorbed in order to understand the entirety of the text. In fact, the movies can be used in the classroom, but AFTER the book is read, discussed, and throughly comprehended. For example, after completing Charlotte Bronte's Jane Eyre (Happy Belated Anniversary!) in my British Literature class, we watched the BBC mini series in order to get the visual effect.
Here is another side to this argument: Shakespeare. William Shakespeare wrote his plays with the intention of them being performed. While it is important and crucial to read and understand his plays in textual form, seeing them performed is just as necessary and helpful to reinforce our understanding of the text. Back in the 16th century, audiences had to watch the plays because most of them were illiterate, but those who were studied Shakespeare's plays when they appeared in print, shortly after their composition.
To close, I would like to thank you all for reading this post. As English, History, Math, Science, Health/Phys Ed., Music, Dance, and Art Teachers (if I forgot your major, my apologies!) there will come a time where you have to make the big choice: To Read or Not to Read?
P.S. Here's a funny cartoon for your enjoyment!